Printable View
http://www.finra.org/Industry/Regula...s/2009/P117744
任何評論，只是在經紀人的討論中選擇了這一點。
例如，如果投資者希望購買價值100萬美元的投資者
提供100比1槓桿的外幣，投資者只需要一個好的
信託存款10,000美元。如果投資者只存入所需的最低資金，並且
如果外幣合約的價值下降了1％（至990,000美元），那麼
賬戶資產將完全耗盡，投資者的頭寸將被平倉
出。投資者將損失全部10,000美元的存款。在零售外匯市場，那裡
既不是任何保證金通知，也不是投資者存入額外資金的通知
保持自己的地位。因此，即使是日內小幅波動的貨幣匯率也是如此
有可能關閉市場兩邊的投資者。
大聲笑..我想知道是誰的錯！責怪經紀人及其槓桿！
此外，旨在限制槓桿比率
減少過度投機的風險。
並賺錢。
Ive been told that the Forex (retail) market has a success rate of about 5%. Being a super careful soul I used a practice account for nearly a year and learned why. It was a 50k account and I didn't worry too much about margins. After a while I started to work under the assumption that I only had 2k of capital. I got a lot more careful. Then opened a live account with 2k. Three months on and I'm breaking even. Never expected to learn this stuff quickly but I believe I am still learning. Never leveraged more than 10x by the way because my aim was to gain experience, not make money.....that comes later. I'm not sure that limiting leverage will achieve much. There are those that will jump in and expect to make money fast and get blown out fast. Some will use money they need for other things. That's their choice. My worry is the nature of some of the advertising that suggests you can make it in Forex with a starting fund of 250 dollars. You can of course but you can also win the lottery and the chances are about even. If the various government bodies are truly concerned about people throwing their money away then Id rather see a requirement that says you have to be certified as competant to play the market. A few months accounts from a practice account perhaps?